Table 5 Zero value global hypothesis test
From: Family farm business and access to rural development polices: a demographic perspective
I typology | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Test | χ2 | DF | Pr > χ2 |
Likelihood ratio | 6,614.769 | 9 | <.0001 |
Score | 7,450.192 | 9 | <.0001 |
Wald | 6,976.323 | 9 | <.0001 |
Association of predicted probabilities and observed answers | |||
Concordant percentage | 52.1 | D Sommers | 0.189 |
Discordant percentage | 33.2 | Gamma | 0.222 |
Linked percentage | 14.8 | Tau-a | 0.020 |
Couples | 538,646,871 | c | 0.594 |
Pseudo R-squared | 0.07 | ||
II typology | |||
Test | χ2 | DF | Pr > χ2 |
Likelihood ratio | 11,253.678 | 8 | <.0001 |
Score | 14,730.895 | 8 | <.0001 |
Wald | 13,103.435 | 8 | <.0001 |
Association of forecasted probabilities and observed answers | |||
Concordant percentage | 45.8 | D Sommers | 0.208 |
Discordant percentage | 25.0 | Gamma | 0.294 |
Linked percentage | 29.2 | Tau-a | 0.021 |
Couples | 538,646,871 | c | 0.604 |
Pseudo R-squared | 0.07 | ||