Step 1: Establishment of an organic community
|
a) The organic community has a strong identity
|
1: Introduction of first standard (date)
|
2: Number of national producers’ associations
|
4: Private standard can still be used
|
b) Producers’ associations have the power to influence other parts of society
|
3: Power of producers’ association
|
5: Proportion of organic farmers that are members of an association (%)
|
Step 2: Establishment of political recognition
|
a) Regulatory support exists
|
6: Introduction of first national regulation (date)
|
|
7: Introduction of current regulation (date)
|
b) Financial support is high
|
10: Introduction of area payment (date)
|
11: Area payment (euro/ha)
|
12: % of agri-environmental scheme devoted to organic farming
|
13: Total amount devoted to OF (millions of euro)
|
15: Loans available for improvement of organic farms
|
16: Lower taxes for organic farmers
|
17: Certification/inspection costs reimbursement
|
18: Research support (million euros/year)
|
c) Strategic support is high
|
20: Action plan for organic farming
|
21: OF incorporation in strategic plan of government
|
22: Quantitative target for proportion cultivated organically (%)
|
Step 3: Establishment of financial support
|
a) Financial support has been introduced
|
10: Introduction of area payment (date)
|
b) Area payments are high enough to off-set the cost incurred by conversion and lower productivity
|
11: Area payment (euro/ha)
|
13: Total amount devoted to organic farming (millions of euro/year)
|
14: % uptake of area support
|
c) Research program is well-funded and complete
|
18: Research support (million euro/year)
|
19: Estimate % of agricultural research funding to organic farming
|
25: Range of research program
|
d) There are financial schemes to help organic farmers
|
15: Loans available for improvement of organic farms
|
16: Lower taxes for organic farmers
|
17: Certification/inspection costs reimbursement
|
18: Research support (million euro/year)
|
Step 4: Development of non-competitive relationships
|
a) Partnership
|
8: Partnerships strength
|
b) Integration of organic farming in state institutions
|
23: Specific office in agricultural ministry
|
24: Degree of integration of OF in training establishments
|
26: Degree of integration of OF in advisory services
|
c) Discussion arena existence
|
9: Discussion arena existence
|
d) Strength of the organic community identity
|
1: Introduction of first standard (date)
|
2: Number of national producers’ associations
|
4: Private standard can still be used
|
e) The power a producers’ associations has
|
3: Power of producers’ association
|
5: Proportion of organic farmers that are members of an association (%)
|
Step 5: Establishment of organic food market
|
a) A complete supply chain exist
|
27: Number of certified processing facilities (2004)
|
28: Promotion by large retailers
|
29: Distribution of sales channels
|
b) Other structural conditions are favourable
|
34: Perception of the quality of certification and control system
|
c) The behaviour of the general consumers is favourable
|
31: Proportion of consumer that can correctly define organic farming (%)
|
32: Acceptable price premium by 50% of the population
|
33: % of the population that buy OP > once a week/>once a month/< once a month
|
d) The market share of organic farming is large
|
30: Market share of organic products (%)
|
Step 6: Development of a committed institutional setting
|
a) An inclusive discussion arena exists
|
9: Discussion arena existence
|
b) An inclusive coordination arena exist
|
20: Action plan for organic farming
|