Skip to main content

Table 6 Factor loading matrix

From: An empirical analysis on technophobia/technophilia in consumer market segmentation

 

Components

1

2

3

4

 

Risk perception

Perception of futility of technologies

Perception of benefits

Trust in the role of information

It may be risky to shift too hastily towards new food technology

0.777

0.122

0.003

-0.141

New food technologies in the long term may have negative effects on the environment

0.707

-0.045

-0.144

0.026

Society should not depend so greatly on new technologies to solve food issues

0.669

0.145

0.123

-0.027

There are many tasty, nutritious foods around, so we do not need to use new food technologies to produce others

0.479

0.353

-0.341

0.114

New food products are no more healthy than traditional foods

-0.136

0.736

0.049

-0.107

The benefits of new food technologies are often over-rated

0.141

0.673

-0.120

-0.042

New food technologies are something I'm unsure about

0.447

0.563

0.039

0.124

New food technologies diminish the natural quality of food

0.439

0.514

-0.258

-0.003

I have no reason to try highly technological foods because those that I eat are already good enough

0.315

0.510

-0.067

0.395

New food technologies ensure that we all have greater control over food choices

0.026

-0.091

0.792

0.080

The products obtained with new food technologies may help people to follow a balanced diet

-0.054

-0.152

0.689

0.250

New food technologies will not have negative effects on health in the long term

-0.071

0.193

0.621

-0.432

The media usually give correct, impartial news on new food technologies

-0.136

0.002

0.167

0.804

  1. Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy = 0.746.
  2. Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity = 853. df = 70; p < 0.0001.
  3. Explained variance 56%.