Skip to main content

Table 3 Capacity levels of key organizations in the agricultural policy processes

From: Institutional reforms and agricultural policy process: lessons from Democratic Republic of Congo

Capacity/Organization

Human capacity

Facilities and infrastructure

Organizational procedures and management systems

Monitoring and evaluation system

Coordination and communication systems

 

Avg. score*

Std. dev.

Avg. score

Std. dev.

Avg. score

Std. dev.

Avg. score

Std. dev.

Avg. score

Std. dev.

Overall

3.8

1.2

3.2

1.2

3.3

1.1

3.0

1.2

3.3

1.1

Main universities

UNIKIN

4.6

1.1

3.7

1.3

3.6

1.2

3.3

1.3

3.6

1.3

UCC

4.5

1.0

4.3

1.3

4.0

1.1

4.1

1.1

4.0

1.2

U. of Yangambi

3.8

1.1

3.1

1.4

3.3

1.0

3.1

1.2

3.1

1.3

U. of Lubumbashi

4.3

1.2

3.5

1.2

3.5

1.3

3.2

1.5

3.3

1.4

Main government ministries and agencies

MINAGRI—national

4.1

1.2

3.2

1.2

3.1

1.1

2.8

1.3

3.0

1.0

MINAGRI—local

3.2

1.1

2.5

1.2

2.5

0.9

2.3

1.1

2.6

0.9

MINRD—national

3.4

1.1

2.6

1.1

2.7

1.0

2.4

1.1

2.7

0.9

MINRD—local

2.9

1.4

2.3

1.0

2.7

1.0

2.3

1.2

2.4

1.0

Ministry of Land

3.8

1.2

3.0

1.3

3.1

1.3

2.8

1.4

3.0

1.2

MINREST

3.6

1.4

2.9

1.3

3.1

1.3

2.8

1.4

3.2

1.3

Ministry of Environment

4.1

1.3

3.4

1.4

3.5

1.3

3.1

1.5

3.3

1.3

Ministry of Finance

4.1

1.2

3.8

1.3

3.5

1.3

3.1

1.5

3.6

1.1

Ministry of Planning

4.2

0.9

3.6

1.2

3.6

1.1

3.3

1.4

3.7

1.0

Ministry of Infrastructure

3.8

1.0

3.3

1.1

3.4

1.1

2.9

1.2

3.1

1.3

Ministry of Women Affairs

3.6

1.5

3.3

1.8

3.4

1.4

3.0

1.5

3.3

1.4

Central Bank, Economic Research Dept.

4.5

1.1

4.2

1.0

4.0

1.2

3.8

1.1

4.4

1.0

Main platforms and associations

CARG

3.4

1.1

2.6

0.9

3.0

1.1

2.8

0.9

3.3

1.2

FEC

3.9

1.2

3.2

1.1

3.6

1.1

3.4

1.1

3.6

1.1

COPEMECO

3.5

1.1

2.8

1.0

3.1

1.0

2.9

0.9

3.2

1.1

FOLECO

3.7

1.1

2.9

1.0

3.2

1.1

3.1

1.2

3.5

1.1

CNONGD

3.6

1.1

2.8

1.1

3.0

1.0

2.9

1.0

3.2

1.0

CRONGD

3.6

1.1

2.7

0.9

3.0

0.9

3.1

1.0

3.2

1.0

  1. Source: Authors’ compilation based on respondents. Notes: *Rating is based on a scale from 1 to 6 (where 1 = no linkages and 6 = very strong linkages). The figures are the mean scores of Net-Map interviewees and 18 respondents from different organizations in DRC, based on a semistructured questionnaire administered during the training on policy analysis on December 16, 2010.