Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of F/t-tests of differences in mean income across investment and labour use patterns

From: Off-farm labour supply and production efficiency of farm household in rural Southwest Nigeria

Description

N

%

Mean

Std. error

Farm income by farm enterprise mix

    

Arable crops only

82

16.8

142,215.80a,b

17,590.50

Arable & tree crops

122

25.0

230,586.35c

15,658.46

Arable crops & livestock

75

15.4

138,596.11a,b

15,680.56

Arable crops, tree crops & livestock

200

40.9

175,099.07b,c

11,727.26

Tree crops and/or livestock

9

1.9

61,556.07a

22,466.14

F-value = 6.587; p < 0.01

    

Off-farm labour Income by activity mix

    

Artisanship

61

26.5

153,977.53a,b

15,767.33

Trading

70

30.6

121,573.38a,b

13,528.98

Paid Job

26

11.3

196,092.74b

52,361.29

Other services

28

12.2

91,293.44a

16,134.62

Artisanship, trading and/or other service

21

9.2

193,644.16b

30,030.38

Paid job + trading/artisanship

23

10.2

357,269.22c

57,770.53

F-value = 9.228; p < 0.01

    

Total labour income by labour use mix

    

Farming only

259

52.9

192,371.76a

12,097.18

Farm and off-farm activities

230

47.1

383,162.75b

16,937.51

t-value = 9.166; p < 0.01

    

Gross income by income source mix

    

Labour only

52

10.6

266,766.86a

30,367.86

Labour & remittances

104

21.2

339,215.71a,b

26,224.03

Labour & asset

120

24.5

356,064.14b

27,998.20

Labour, asset & remittances

214

43.7

387,364.01b

21,238.92

F-value = 2.538; p < 0.10

    
  1. NOTE: Mean incomes within each socio-economic group that carry the same superscript, a b or c are not significantly different, while those having different superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05.