Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean difference in some welfare indicators between adopters and non-adopters of improved rice varieties

From: Agricultural technology adoption, commercialization and smallholder rice farmers’ welfare in rural Nigeria

Variable

All

Adopters (N = 348)

Non-adopters (N = 215)

Difference

t-value

Consumption expend. per capita

21897.78 (954.84)

23201.19 (1117.76)

19788.07 (1719.63)

3413.12 (1961.78)

1.74*

Rice income per hectare

223555.90 (6109.67)

231268.30 (8063.61)

211072.70 (9212.44)

20195.59 (12557.55)

1.61

Rice income per capita

28503.33 (1054.86)

32500.24 (1860.09)

26033.81 (1245.49)

6466.44 (2155.88)

2.99***

Total farm income per capita

43188.73 (1607.10)

42775.88 (1796.17)

43856.98 (3048.06)

1081.11 (3310.46)

0.33

Average yield (kg/ha)

3271.07 (94.35)

3408.13 (122.6)

3049.22 (146.57)

358.90 (193.78)

1.85*

Total farm size (ha)

2.59 (0.09)

2.63 (0.12)

2.55 (0.16)

0.08 (0.19)

0.39

Access to credit (%)

23.45 (0.02)

12.07 (0.02)

41.86 (0.03)

29.79 (0.03)

8.61***

Market participation (%)

70.69 (0.02)

60.63 (0.03)

86.97 (0.02)

26.34 (0.04)

6.94***

Cost of seed (N)

124.97 (1.56)

124.71 (1.49)

125.39 (1.82)

0.684 (2.38)

0.287

Distance to source of seed (KM)

4.39 (0.27)

5.36 (0.39)

2.80 (0.29)

2.56 (0.55)

4.61

  1. Source: Field survey, 2010. ***, **, and * implies significant at 1 %, 5 %, and 10 % respectively
  2. Note: Figures in Parentheses are the standard error