Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Agricultural and Food Economics
Agricultural and Food Economics Cover Image

Table 3 Results of the assessment of structural model

From: The dark and the bright side of power: implications for the management of business-to-business relationships

Hypotheses Effects of latent variables t-statistics Beta (path) coefficients (b) Correlation coefficient (r) b r
H1a CP → COOR 3.142365 −0.276474 −0.181373 0.050
H1b CP → COOP 3.211364 −0.291692 −0.249700 0.073
H2a RWP → COOR 0.172568 0.016637 0.231527 0.004
H2b RWP → COOP 1.476850 −0.193422 0.085145 −0.016
H3a EP → COOR 3.836822 0.372217 0.419556 0.156
H3b EP → COOP 2.418828 0.292702 0.375932 0.110
H4a IP → COOR 0.130923 0.014832 0.271215 0.004
H4b IP → COOP 2.736924 0.257051 0.372067 0.096
H5a LP → COOR 0.078643 0.007748 −0.248269 −0.002
H5b LP → COOP 1.037731 −0.107228 −0.306813 0.033
H6a RFP → COOR 2.910312 0.257730 0.360260 0.093
H6b RFP → COOP 1.588292 0.145881 0.257241 0.038
  1. Source: own calculations
  2. Abbreviations: COOR coordination, COOP cooperation, CP coercive power, RWP reward power, EP expert power, IP informational power, LP legitimate power, RFP referent power
Back to article page