From: Consumer interest towards tropical fruit: factors affecting avocado fruit consumption in Italy
Ordered logistic regression | Number of obs = 260 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LR chi2 (23) = 211.74 | ||||||
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 | ||||||
Log likelihood = − 300.72018 | Pseudo R 2 = 0.2604 | |||||
Frequency of avocado consumption | Odds ratio | Std. err. | z | P > |z| | [95% conf. interval] | |
Frequency of traditional fruit consumption | 0.8610 | 0.0729 | − 1.77 | 0.077 | 0.7293 | 1.0165 |
Frequency of tropical fruit consumption | 3.3914 | 0.4054 | 10.22 | 0.000 | 2.6831 | 4.2867 |
Food neophilia | 1.3122 | 0.0147 | 0.83 | 0.004 | 0.9838 | 1.0413 |
Processed fruit | 0.8662 | 0.2348 | − 0.53 | 0.596 | 0.5091 | 1.4736 |
Taste | 1.2750 | 0.1321 | 2.34 | 0.019 | 1.0406 | 1.5621 |
Price | 0.8098 | 0.0823 | − 2.08 | 0.038 | 0.6635 | 0.9883 |
Convenience of consumption | 1.1141 | 0.1358 | 0.89 | 0.375 | 0.8774 | 1.4146 |
Health benefits | 0.9936 | 0.1266 | − 0.05 | 0.960 | 0.7740 | 1.2754 |
Appearance | 1.0353 | 0.1091 | 0.33 | 0.742 | 0.8422 | 1.2728 |
Perishability | 1.2793 | 0.1157 | 2.72 | 0.006 | 1.0715 | 1.5273 |
Stage of ripeness (unripe) | 1.3680 | 0.0960 | − 2.81 | 0.005 | 0.5040 | 0.8854 |
Pulp creaminess (texture) | 1.3622 | 0.1920 | 2.19 | 0.028 | 1.0335 | 1.7956 |
Local origin | 1.5174 | 0.1013 | 0.17 | 0.063 | 0.8369 | 1.2367 |
Organic certification | 1.4955 | 0.1179 | 0.04 | 0.070 | 0.7893 | 1.2556 |
Seasonality | 1.0194 | 0.1164 | 0.17 | 0.866 | 0.8150 | 1.2751 |
Peel integrity (bruising) | 1.0080 | 0.0940 | 0.09 | 0.932 | 0.8397 | 1.2100 |
Age | 0.9994 | 0.0104 | − 0.06 | 0.956 | 0.9793 | 1.0200 |
Gender | 2.0337 | 0.5269 | 2.74 | 0.006 | 1.2240 | 3.3791 |
Education | 1.2302 | 0.2268 | 1.12 | 0.061 | 0.8571 | 1.7657 |
Living in urban area | 0.6553 | 0.1879 | − 1.47 | 0.141 | 0.3736 | 1.1497 |
Income | 1.2217 | 0.0893 | 2.74 | 0.006 | 1.0587 | 1.4099 |
/cut1 | 3.0720 | 1.1812 | 0.7570 | 5.3870 | ||
/cut2 | 4.5396 | 1.1946 | 2.1982 | 6.8810 |