Advertisement
Table 3 Others features of the sample
| Percentage | |
|---|---|
| SPG attendance time | |
| 1 year or less | 9.4 |
| 2 years | 13.8 |
| 3 years | 15.3 |
| 4 years | 14.0 |
| 5 years or more | 47.4 |
| Total | 100 |
| Role inside SPG | |
| I am not actively involved in the organization, and I am an occasional user. | 7 |
| I am not actively involved in the organization, but I am a regular user. | 27.8 |
| I am actively involved in the organization, but I am not dealing with suppliers. | 26 |
| I am actively involved in the organization, and I deal with suppliers. | 39.1 |
| Total | 100 |
| Percentage of food expenditure from SPG | |
| 0–20% | 16.1 |
| 20–30% | 20.1 |
| 30–40% | 23.1 |
| More than 40% | 40.6 |
| Total | 100 |
| Motivation to participate in a SPG | |
| Solidarity with producers and the territory | 24.3 |
| Affordability | 0.5 |
| Quality of food | 41.8 |
| Awareness to environmental issues | 32.5 |
| Opportunity for socialization | 1 |
| Total | 100 |
| Urban/rural character of SPG participants | |
| Lives in an OECD urban municipality (> 150 people/km2) | 96.9 |
| Lives in an OECD rural municipality (< 150 people/km2) but belonging to a FUA | 1.9 |
| Lives in an OECD rural municipality | 1.2 |
