Skip to main content

Table 3 Double-hurdle estimation factors affecting adoption of drought-tolerant teff (Craggit model)

From: Adoption analysis of agricultural technologies in the semiarid northern Ethiopia: a panel data analysis

Variables

Without HH controls

With HH controls

HH controls + CRE

Hurdle 1

Hurdle 2

Hurdle 1

Hurdle 2

Hurdle 1

Hurdle 2

Mean farm level pop pressure at community level

0.091

(0.088)

− 0.179*

(0.104)

0.080

(0.108)

− 0.061

(0.107)

0.102

(0.122)

− 0.061

(0.118)

Deviation of farm-level pop pressure from community mean

− 0.012

(0.047)

− 0.053

(0.078)

0.003

(0.060)

0.033

(0.060)

0.008

(0.065)

0.035

(0.052)

Mean rainfall 2003–2014 (cm)

− 0.001

(0.007)

− 0.004

(0.007)

− 0.002

(0.007)

− 0.004

(0.007)

− 0.001

(0.007)

− 0.009

(0.006)

St. Dev. rainfall 2003–2014 (cm)

0.015

(0.112)

− 0.027

(0.096)

0.055

(0.116)

0.042

(0.116)

0.028

(0.117)

0.069

(0.102)

One-year lagged positive deviation rainfall (cm)

0.029***

(0.007)

0.005

(0.006)

0.031***

(0.007)

0.002

(0.005)

0.030***

(0.007)

0.008*

(0.005)

One-year lagged negative deviation rainfall (cm)

− 0.017

(0.025)

− 0.004

(0.019)

− 0.021

(0.025)

0.000

(0.021)

− 0.016

(0.025)

0.016

(0.022)

Two-year lagged positive deviation rainfall (cm)

0.014

(0.030)

0.007

(0.034)

0.004

(0.031)

− 0.008

(0.026)

− 0.002

(0.033)

0.018

(0.027)

Two-year lagged negative deviation rainfall (cm)

− 0.008

(0.014)

− 0.018

(0.011)

− 0.008

(0.015)

− 0.014

(0.010)

− 0.010

(0.015)

− 0.018

(0.011)

Distance to market (h)

0.052

(0.062)

0.158***

(0.044)

0.045

(0.063)

0.123***

(0.044)

0.060

(0.061)

0.109***

(0.038)

Year 2010 dummy

− 0.616*

(0.317)

− 0.157

(0.208)

0.901***

(0.321)

− 0.049

(0.225)

− 0.680**

(0.331)

0.015

(0.198)

Year 2015 dummy

− 0.701*

(0.425)

− 0.373

(0.342)

− 0.912**

(0.425)

− 0.167

(0.308)

− 0.843**

(0.427)

− 0.109

(0.327)

Constant

− 1.291*

(0.710)

1.693***

(0.548)

2.810***

(1.061)

− 0.169

(1.626)

− 2.126*

(1.217)

− 1.910

(1.419)

Sigma constant

 

0.458***

(0.042)

 

0.394***

(0.029)

 

0.359***

(0.025)

Chi2

57.21

 

92.38

 

130.10

 

Log-likelihood

− 333.77

 

− 309.32

 

− 294.78

 

Prob > Chi2

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

0.0000

 

6.3.1.1.2. N

995

115

995

115

995

115

  1. Note: Hurdle 1 is the probability of adoption and hurdle 2is the log of area planted upon adoption of the technology. The HH Control + CRE models include the mean and actual value of time-variant household control variables (not reported in this table to save space). Numbers in parenthesis are cluster robust standard errors. ***, **, and * are to 1, 5, and 10 % levels of significance, respectively. Source: NMBU and MU household panel survey.