Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlates of household dietary diversity

From: Food consumption patterns, nutrient adequacy, and the food systems in Nigeria

 

Country

Rural

Urban

Mobile phone (0/1)

0.20***

0.19***

0.24

(0.06)

(0.06)

(0.15)

Electricity (0/1)

0.13**

0.12

0.20*

(0.06)

(0.07)

(0.12)

Improved sources of water (1/0)

0.12*

0.06

0.24**

(0.06)

(0.07)

(0.10)

Irrigation (0/1)

0.17

0.36*

−0.31

(0.20)

(0.20)

(0.28)

Improved sanitation, community (%)

0.23**

0.33***

0.02

(0.10)

(0.11)

(0.16)

Health center/hospital in community (0/1)

−0.11**

−0.08

−0.15**

(0.05)

(0.07)

(0.07)

Distance to nearest market (KMs)

0.00

0.00

0.00

(0.00)

(0.00)

(0.00)

Fraction of agriculture within 1 km buffera

0.23*

0.30*

0.15

(0.13)

(0.17)

(0.28)

Constant

6.91***

6.77***

7.21***

(0.31)

(0.32)

(0.62)

Observations

4040

2721

1319

r2

0.50

0.52

0.38

  1. Controls include state and month of interview fixed effects; dummies for agro-ecological zones; distance to nearest population center; age, sex, and education of the household head (post-primary dummy); household size; dependency ratio; ratio of expenditure on MAH to expenditure on food at home; dummy for HH income quintile; and dummy for rural/urban for country specification. Note: standard errors clustered at enumeration area-level and presented in brackets
  2. aThe variable was rescaled by dividing by 100 for readability
  3. ***p<0.01, **p<0.05, *p<0.1