Skip to main content

Table 8 Effects of participation in food-for-work versus cash-for-work on household dietary diversity (fixed effects models)

From: Implications of food-for-work programs for consumption and production diversity: Evidence from the Tigray Region of Ethiopia

 

(1)

(2)

Food-for-work only (0/1)

0.98***

0.62*

(0.25)

(0.33)

Cash-for-work only (0/1)

0.43

− 1.40

(0.50)

(1.06)

Both food-and cash-for work (0/1)

0.44

0.96

(0.52)

(1.10)

Food-for-work only (0/1)*year2006

 

0.21

 

(0.56)

Cash-for-work only (0/1)*year2006

 

1.78

 

(1.30)

Both food-and cash-for work (0/1)*year2006

 

− 0.58

 

(1.72)

Food-for-work only (0/1)*year2010

 

1.41**

 

(0.61)

Cash-for-work only (0/1)*year2010

 

3.36**

 

(1.40)

Both food-and cash-for work (0/1)*year2010

 

− 0.34

 

(1.23)

2003

− 1.20***

− 1.25***

(0.29)

(0.31)

2006

0.69**

0.56

(0.30)

(0.41)

2010

1.26***

0.66*

(0.31)

(0.40)

Household characteristics

Yes

Yes

Constant

13.52***

13.54***

(1.10)

(1.11)

Number of households (groups)

1426 (514)

1426 (514)

R2 (overall)

0.14

0.14

  1. Standard errors in parentheses. Classification of groups: 531, 65, and 89 participate in food-for-work (FFW) only, cash-for-work (CFW) only, and combination of FFW and CFW, respectively. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%