Skip to main content

Table 5 Parameter estimates for conventional and selectivity SPF models: Matched sample

From: Can producer groups improve technical efficiency among artisanal shrimpers in Nigeria? A study accounting for observed and unobserved selectivity

lnTOTALCAP

Conventional SPF

Sample selection SPF

Pooled

MEM

CONN

MEM

CONN

Coeff

Coeff

Coeff

Coeff

Coeff

lnENGINEOPER

0.79***

(0.07)

0.66***

(0.13)

0.84***

(0.09)

0.70***

(0.17)

0.83***

(0.11)

lnFUELCOST

0.10**

(0.04)

0.16***

(0.06)

0.08

(0.05)

0.14*

(0.08)

0.08

(0.06)

lnLEADERSEMP

0.18**

(0.08)

0.08

(0.12)

0.23**

(0.11)

0.09

(0.18)

0.23*

(0.12)

lnHELPERSEMP

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.07

(0.14)

0.22

(0.20)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.20

(0.18)

0.20

(0.30)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.21

(0.20)

lnUSEFULSEINE

0.06**

(0.04)

0.09**

(0.04)

0.05

(0.03)

0.10

(0.05)

0.05

(0.04)

ONDO

0.09**

(0.04)

0.12

(0.10)

0.07

(0.05)

0.05

(0.13)

0.05

(0.06)

AKWA-IBOM

0.08*

(0.04)

0.16**

(0.08)

0.05

(0.05)

0.11

(0.10)

0.04

(0.06)

SHOCK

0.07**

(0.03)

0.07

(0.06)

0.08**

(0.04)

0.06

(0.08)

0.09*

(0.05)

HIGHENGCAP

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

(0.10)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.30**

(0.14)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.02

(0.13)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.30

(0.22)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.01

(0.19)

FISHVILL

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.02

(0.03)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.10*

(0.05)

0.01

(0.04)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

(0.09)

0.01

(0.05)

Leadercontrol

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.04

(0.05)

0.02

(0.07)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.07

(0.06)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.02

(0.09)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.07

(0.06)

Helpercontrol

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.04

(0.10)

0.16

(0.16)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

(0.13)

0.14

(0.26)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.13

(0.15)

MEMBERSHIP

0.12***

(0.04)

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Constant

9.29***

(0.48)

8.49***

(0.70)

9.73***

(0.63)

8.70***

(0.94)

9.66***

(0.72)

Ī»

1.19***

(0.06)

1.20***

(0.19)

1.28***

(0.07)

Ā Ā 

\({\sigma }^{2}\)

0.13***

(0.02)

0.09***

(0.04)

0.14***

(0.02)

Ā Ā 

\({\sigma }_{u}\)

Ā Ā Ā 

0.24*

(0.12)

0.28***

(0.07)

\({\sigma }_{v}\)

Ā Ā Ā 

0.20***

(0.05)

0.25***

(0.04)

\({\rho }_{(w,v)}\)

Ā Ā Ā 

0.45

(0.52)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.33

(0.34)

Return to scale

1.13

0.91

1.07

0.84

1.06

Number of obs

350

92

258

92

258

Log likelihood

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰52.17

0.67

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰46.22

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰80.01

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰113.68

  1. ***pā€‰<ā€‰0.01, **pā€‰<ā€‰0.05, *pā€‰<ā€‰0.1
  2. The results for pooled, MEM, and CONN models were estimated using Eq.Ā (15). Standard errors are presented in parentheses
  3. Source: Authorsā€™ calculation based on survey data