Skip to main content

Table 4 Parameter estimates for conventional and selectivity SPF models: Unmatched sample

From: Can producer groups improve technical efficiency among artisanal shrimpers in Nigeria? A study accounting for observed and unobserved selectivity

lnTOTALCAP

Conventional SPF

Sample selection SPF

Pooled

MEM

CONN

MEM

CONN

Coeff

Coeff

Coeff

Coeff

Coeff

lnENGINEOPER

0.79***

(0.07)

0.69***

(0.13)

0.84***

(0.09)

0.72***

(0.16)

0.83***

(0.11)

lnFUELCOST

0.10**

(0.04)

0.16***

(0.06)

0.08

(0.05)

0.14*

(0.08)

0.08

(0.06)

lnLEADERSEMP

0.17**

(0.08)

0.06

(0.12)

0.23**

(0.11)

0.06

(0.19)

0.23*

(0.12)

lnHELPERSEMP

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.05

(0.13)

0.24

(0.19)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.20

(0.18)

0.23

(0.29)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.21

(0.20)

lnUSEFULSEINE

0.06**

(0.03)

0.09**

(0.04)

0.05

(0.03)

0.09

(0.07)

0.05

(0.04)

ONDO

0.09**

(0.04)

0.13

(0.10)

0.07

(0.05)

0.05

(0.13)

0.05

(0.06)

AKWA-IBOM

0.09**

(0.04)

0.17**

(0.08)

0.05

(0.05)

0.12

(0.10)

0.04

(0.06)

SHOCK

0.07**

(0.03)

0.06

(0.06)

0.08**

(0.04)

0.06

(0.08)

0.09*

(0.05)

HIGHENGCAP

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

(0.10)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.31**

(0.15)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.02

(0.13)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.30

(0.23)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.01

(0.19)

FISHVILL

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.01

(0.03)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.09*

(0.05)

0.01

(0.04)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.11

(0.09)

0.01

(0.05)

Leadercontrol

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.04

(0.04)

0.00

(0.07)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.07

(0.06)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.002

(0.09)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.07

(0.06)

Helpercontrol

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.03

(0.10)

0.17

(0.16)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

(0.13)

0.16

(0.26)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.13

(0.15)

MEMBERSHIP

0.11***

(0.04)

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Constant

9.28

(0.48)

8.44***

(0.68)

9.73***

(0.63)

8.60***

(0.95)

9.66***

(0.72)

Ī»

1.18***

(0.06)

1.12***

(0.21)

1.28***

(0.07)

Ā Ā 

\({\sigma }^{2}\)

0.13***

(0.02)

0.09***

(0.05)

0.14***

(0.02)

Ā Ā 

\({\sigma }_{u}\)

Ā Ā Ā 

0.23*

(0.13)

0.28***

(0.07)

\({\sigma }_{v}\)

Ā Ā Ā 

0.21***

(0.05)

0.25***

(0.04)

\({\rho }_{(w,v)}\)

Ā Ā Ā 

0.43

(0.47)

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.32

(0.34)

Return to scale

1.12

0.93

1.07

0.86

1.06

Number of obs

353

95

258

95

258

Log likelihood

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰51.69

2.96

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰46.22

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰80.40

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰114.32

  1. ***pā€‰<ā€‰0.01, **pā€‰<ā€‰0.05, *pā€‰<ā€‰0.1
  2. The results for pooled, MEM, and CONN models were estimated using Eq.Ā (15). Standard errors are presented in parentheses
  3. Source: Authorsā€™ calculation based on survey data