Table 6 Documents whose resilience level is derived from surveys results
Reference | Resilience subject | Resilience dimension | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Hossard et al. (2021) | AFSC | TBL | On the bases of 8 performances indicators (i.e., land; labor; income; yields; family assets; market access and commercialization; irrigation and policies) through a participatory assessment the most resilient farm types were assessed |
Meldrum et al. (2018) | Crops | TBL | Assessment of the role of crop diversity in farmers’ adaptation actions; investigation on how farmers’ use of diversity in adaptation is related to their perceptions of crop and variety tolerances and other environmental, social, and economic factors on the bases of a community resilience self-assessment |
Paas et al. (2021) | AFSC | TBL | Participatory assessment for defining the perceived resilience of three farm systems (i.e., starch potatoes, dairy and hazelnut production) on the bases of a developed framework named Framework of Participatory Impact Assessment for Sustainable and Resilient FARMing systems (FoPIA-SURE-Farm) which includes some activities and their relative achievable score |
Coopmans et al. (2021) | AFSC | Economic | Questionnaire sent to farmers to assess how the Covid-19 crises impacted from a business perspective and whether farmers resorted to available resilience capacities; 32 variables with their related measurement are involved |
Jacobi et al. (2018) | AFSC | Social-environmental | Indicator survey-based assessment of the social-ecological resilience on the bases of buffer capacity, self-organization, capacity of learning and adaptation. 16 indicators and their rating criteria are proposed |
Cetinkaya Ciftcioglu (2022) | Landscape | TBL | Assessment of the resilience of the agricultural landscapes and associated ecosystem built on 21 elements, and for each of them a resilience indicator assessment was associated |
Dixon et al. (2021) | AFSC | TBL | Response and resilience to Covid-19 shock assessment by the degree of initial recovery of 5 domains: productivity, economic, natural resources, human conditions and social capital |
AFSC | TBL | SHARP (Self-evaluation and Holistic Assessment of Climate Resilience of Farmers and Pastoralists) tool implemented for assessing the climate resilience of farmers respectively implemented in Philippines (Heckelman et al. 2018) and Switzerland (Diserens et al. 2018). It is a survey-based digital instrument developed by FAO (https://www.fao.org/in-action/sharp/sharp-tool/en/) constituted by 33 modules related to different aspects of the household and farm system; the application automatically calculates the compound resilience scores per module, and an overall score | |
Béné et al. (2017) | Households | Social | Resilience impact assessment on the bases of a set of indicators constituting a framework |