Skip to content

Advertisement

Peer-review policy

Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help. Editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. You can read more about the peer-review process here.

Agricultural and Food Economics operates a double-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers do not know the names or affiliations of the authors and the reviewer reports provided to the authors are anonymous.

The benefit of double-blind peer review is that it allows reviewers to judge the manuscript based on content alone, and they are not unconsciously biased by knowledge of who the authors are.

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two or more experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication.The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with Associate Editors.

Affiliated with

  • SIDEA_logo

2017 Journal Metrics

  • Citation impact
    1.31 - CiteScore
    1.1 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)
    0.435 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 

    Speed
    117 days from submission to first decision
    22 days from acceptance to publication

    Usage 
    107,942 downloads

    Social Media Impact
    73 mentions

New Content ItemAgricultural and Food Economics is indexed in Scopus, the world's largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature. 

This journal is also indexed by DOAJ, EconLit, Google Scholar, OCLC, RePEc, Summon by ProQuest

Advertisement